The Global Direct Investment Forum

Sustainable Prosperity for a Networked World

On The Short List

GDI Solutions

Press Release : GDI Forum Launch in 2006

The GDI Foundation
Home Up Join Us Contact Us Links Search

About Us
Structure
The Networks
The Leaders
The Challenges
Market Impact
GDI Foundation
Thought Leaders
News
Feedback
Contents

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Background Essay by Bruce Donnelly about the Global Direct Investment Forum

The Global Direct Investment Forum is where corporate social responsibility and sustainable community development meet to achieve corporate, economic, and social development goals through innovation, social entrepreneurship, and the positive impact of global direct investment on communities in transition worldwide.

Biographic Profile - refer to OnTheShortList.com or GDI-Solutions.com

January 16, 2006 -- The Global Direct Investment Forum (GDI Forum) is being developed and launched in 2006 as the next step in a strategic plan to leverage the positive impact of corporate direct investment projects as a powerful tool to uplift the world.  It's a lever for progress toward sustainable prosperity through action-oriented B2B networking with both corporate development and social economic development objectives.  It can improve many communities which recognize and value the potential benefits of capital investment projects and sustainable growth to prosperity in a globally competitive business environment over time.

Companies invest billions of dollars every year in thousands of capital investment projects which create hundreds of thousands of new productive jobs for individuals.

The mission is to overcome great challenges to such economic development.  Global business can drive economic growth to achieve sustainable prosperity worldwide.

Our goal isn't to "make poverty history" or to work at governmental or multilateral agency direction to meet their declared development goals.  Frankly, such goals and their funding priorities typically reflect incremental progress through gradual and limited consensus or symbolic political commitments to invest in the actual achievement of challenging objectives.  Non-profits are typically organized to perpetuate themselves, like government agencies, as if all challenges were inevitable and insoluble.  It is not our goal to solve all of the economic and social problems of the world.  Our goal is to focus on what can be achieved, and to find innovative ways to achieve more.

Free people can make their own poverty history by finding news ways to work together to achieve greater goals than just solving that urgent problem.  They may obviously need help to escape their predicament, but the focus is to help those who are motivated and ready to work together to change their communities.  It is not possible to help everyone, so it is necessary to choose priorities and demonstrate what is possible, and then build on that progress by innovative work elsewhere.

The goal also isn't "sustainable development" in the sense of simply doing somewhat less harm to our environment than in the past.  It is to make our world better in some way every day, rather than to just slow down the pace at which we are rapidly making a bad problem worse.

Do more of what demonstrably works.  Do less of what doesn't.  That's the performance discipline of business metrics - not government.

The objective isn't to be less poor or less harmful to our world.  It is to uplift our world as a network of communities with a common interest in achieving a dramatically better future for us all, regardless of how each community and individual defines a "better" future, or the different starting points at which we find ourselves today.  It is also worth noting, as in financial statements, that past success need not be indicative of future results.  In a fast-changing and very competitive world, nobody can guarantee what the relative outcomes will be.  It is not, however, a zero sum game of winners and losers.  A networked world offers great potential for everyone in it, and that has little to do with all the talk about a "digital divide" or the old North-South debate about the social obligations of the "haves" to help the "have nots".  It is good business to help create efficient and prosperous markets full of talented, successful people and then continuously find new ways to work together to mutual advantage.

The objective is to make sustainable prosperity a global legacy which can be achieved by this generation of business leaders worldwide by working together across traditional political-economic borders.  Global businesses already find common interests and mobilize their cross-border resources efficiently to succeed.  They have organized networks of hundreds of thousands of people around the world to achieve things which a generation or two ago would have been considered impossible.

The same can be done for the great social economic development challenges of our time as a "second legacy" of such entrepreneurial leaders and the people who keep such organizations competitive through constant innovation and efficient, high-quality processes to deliver high value products and services to their customers.

The "boomer" generation in the United States is not unique.  Similar patterns exist in Europe and other countries.  Unfortunately, the opposite is true in some places such as Africa, where pandemics, genocide, wars, and chronic failures of governance have ripped apart societies which were already struggling just to survive.  It is fairly easy to believe that failure is inevitable in the face of such great challenges.  It is tempting to think that realistic policy choices and even great charity cannot possibly reverse the situation.  That is easy and tempting, but wrong. 

Businesses can dramatically transform local economies within a short span of years as has been proven repeatedly all over the world.  By contrast, governments rarely drive rapid transformation of their economies, although they can help to support rather than obstruct progress.

Although governments tend to talk about apparently insoluble social risks related to an aging population, unfunded pension liabilities, Social Security challenges, and rising health costs as people live longer, there is a tendency to overlook the enormous potential value of large numbers of very talented, experienced people in their "second half" of life.  Instead of dying soon after retirement as in past decades, at the height of their chosen careers and experience, many will now live much longer and be highly motivated to "give back" to society in innovative and very practical, effective ways, whether through social initiatives (philanthropy, charity, etc.) or continued leadership of their families and social initiatives of importance to their own communities or the issues which motivate them to get actively involved.

Governments fail to recognize the power of business investment as well as large networks of motivated, experienced entrepreneurs as leaders who can potentially change the world within a short span of time by organizing the talented teams and resources necessary to achieve what others regard as impossible. 

It recalls the spirit of Thomas Edison, who could proudly say without hesitation that he had successfully proven thousands of ways in which you could not possibly make a light bulb - before he finally figured out how to do it.  Other innovators and entrepreneurs have achieved breakthroughs with similar persistence and focus on what works.  We already know what doesn't work.  We need to do less of that, focus on what works, and innovate for potential breakthroughs to achieve rapid progress.

The great social and economic challenges we face are the potential breakthroughs of our time that are still waiting to happen - not insoluble problems.  It isn't just the young innovators and entrepreneurs who have much to contribute.  Elderly leaders also have great experience, networks, and power to transform communities.  Even the poorest people on earth have dreams and try to pursue them, no matter how limited or different their current dreams may seem to others.  They are motivated to achieve progress in their lives for the benefit of themselves and their families, however they define such progress.  That is the foundation on which to build prosperity.

The innovators and entrepreneurs of our time have been changing the world at a breathtaking pace.  Governments don't drive such changes.  Businesses do - not because business is inherently good or led by more capable and socially responsible people, but because business is how diverse individuals work together to achieve their great goals in creative, productive ways.  Governments are expected to avoid risks and change slowly.  Businesses are expected to take risks, innovate, and grow rapidly if they succeed, or adapt quickly or disappear if they fail.

Breakthrough innovation and progress to achieve great social and individual goals in communities worldwide will be driven by local business leaders, not government.  Government is very important to the social environment and market conditions in which business and individuals pursue their interests, but business drives progress.  It is now possible to network local business leaders on a global basis to achieve cross-border progress and prosperity at the exponential growth pace which is required to not only "make poverty history", but to make sustainable prosperity our shared future legacy through the investment choices and global collaboration in our time.

Cross-border investment activity - such as new or expanded offices, factories, distribution centers, or other types of business investment projects - is not limited to "foreign" direct investment flows, such as across national political borders.  Most business is not defined or constrained by geopolitical boundaries, nor is the objective to achieve better national economic statistics (GDP, balance of trade or payments, etc.).

Countless businesses have crossed borders successfully to collaborate for mutual benefit for centuries.  It is truly remarkable when two governments achieve this, and rare when multiple governments collaborate to more than the minimal degree which circumstances require.

Instead of finding common ground for working together, it is more common for self-perpetuating government bureaucracies to develop rigid "policies" through which they persistently butt heads with similar bureaucracies elsewhere who feel that their "position" is superior or equally justifiable.  The problem isn't that government leaders are unwise, stubborn, or ill-informed or insensitive to different points of view by others.  The problem is that political systems are organized to relentless pursue and defend self-interests, and develop adversarial bureaucracies designed explicitly for that ethnocentric and egotistical purpose.

By contrast, business only succeeds by consistently reaching mutually beneficial deals with others, and by respecting their different capabilities and interests to achieve progress together.  That is why business drives great social and economic progress over time, rather than governmental or multilateral assistance programs.

"Global Direct Investment" can flow between countries or between neighboring communities.  It is the free flow of private capital investment and other resources to sustain business activity in more than one local or "home" market.  As companies grow, they typically seek new markets where their products or services will be valued, whether nearby or far away.  As they become more global in nature, their national origin doesn't define their "home".  Their home is in many communities, with different functions deployed in different places according to local capabilities to contribute productively to the achievement of both local and global goals.

There are well-established financial markets to raise and invest capital to support government services, business growth, and personal investment objectives.

There is no efficient global marketplace to assist executives as their companies invest directly in expansion of their own operations, rather than in financial markets or in growth by merger and acquisition deals or business alliances and partnerships.  This "organic growth" market required, by definition, multiple specialties because a business has to get all aspects of the business "right" in the new location to achieve the desired objectives.   Unfortunately, companies must constantly "reinvent the wheel", learning for themselves or with the help of a variety of separate specialists or limited networks of contacts how to achieve their objectives in growing markets.

The GDI Forum is a new approach to that challenge.  The Forum isn't to bring top executives and professionals together as another "talking shop" or passive B2B networking organization such as a trade or professional association, chamber of commerce, or event organizer.  Instead, the goal is to achieve proactive networking for a common purpose with demonstrable results both for companies and for the communities in which they choose to do business. 

The Forum is intended to define clear objectives and goals for innovation and results in economic development.   The active work together to drive innovation and "social entrepreneur ventures" in this market should help companies to grow faster and better in places which may present complex challenges and opportunities, such as communities in economic transition or emerging markets.

For More Information Contact:

Bruce Donnelly

bruce@gdi-solutions.com

Tel: 847-304-4655     FAX: 847-304-5375

Global Direct Investment Forum
PO Box 439, Fox River Grove, IL 60021-0439

See also : Thought Leaders and Links


 

Home ] Up ] About Us ] Structure ] The Networks ] The Leaders ] The Challenges ] Market Impact ] GDI Foundation ] Thought Leaders ] Feedback ] Contents ]

Send mail to bruce@gdi-solutions.com with questions or suggestions for our work or this web site.
Copyright © 2006 Global Direct Investment Solutions, Inc.
P.O. Box 439, Fox River Grove, IL 60021-0439  TEL 847-304-4655
Last modified: 01/21/06